read and comment on this article. It 'important to know that .....
Giampaolo Pansa, after the "unexpected success of his earlier books (" The losers "has sold more than 400 000 copies) that told the stories and sufferings of the vanquished Salo, raised now shot focusing on the "big lie" political history which, he has accompanied for many years the myth of the Resistance. In 2006, in a rarefied atmosphere of opposition, it seems inappropriate and out of season deal with the old lies. I'm just a small bench press, from the backyard that Prodi and Tronchetti Provera criticize each other for the case of the League's Telecom Calderoli mocking those who put the lie to her yesterday same electoral reform calling it a "crap" .... We are in an atmosphere of unguarded bipolar passions so as to enable the majority and opposition MPs to give themselves fraternally of you, they know that the "alternation, while it lasts, in turn rewards the two poles in competition: then the problems to be solved are the same for everyone. So nothing really dramatic in our everyday little white lies. The big lie is talking about political history Giampaolo Pansa in his latest essay refers to the civil war 60 years ago, it has a purpose, therefore retrospective, nor has a remotely comparable impact of current, for example, the big lie of GW Bush on weapons of mass destruction Mass ever found in Iraq. Yet they are triggered once the first reactions to "yet another provocation of Pansa, perhaps because it has touched a raw nerve in our recent history.
Pansa part with the spear against the commonly accepted politically correct and remove the "rhetoric scaffolding built by the communists after the war to glorify the resistance, no ifs, ands or buts. Hiding, however - and here would be the big lie-that the armed struggle led by the Communists in the Resistance and in the following years were more likely than "to create the basis for the" introduction of a class that they favored and led not to give a contribution to the birth or revival of democracy in Italia.Il journalist had been accused of bringing grist to the mill of the revisionists who would overturn the traditional historical interpretations on Fascism and Resistance. But, on closer inspection, revisionism is not "anything goes when you tell the sinkholes or individual episodes experienced by the losing side. It simply means that fill a void left by the rhetoric or deliberately by "indifference of the media. And "a task that can be undertaken by unscrupulous journalists who are not historians, as Pansa. D" Moreover even a journalist raised and grew up always in shadow of power, as Bruno Vespa, in his "Winners and losers" of the "year last had devoted much of his reflections on the seasons of "hate that have marked the history of the Italian resistance from terrorism, with chapters specifically dedicated to the" massacre of the vanquished, "to" thirty thousand dead after the liberation, "the sinkholes and the ethnic cleansing Marshal Tito.Ma because c "has taken so long to go beyond the real or alleged lies, if only to open a debate on issues such delicate and important? Why in G. Pansa were not enough the first 40 years of writer-journalist AA B. Vespa long decades of pompous television journalism, to discover and make popular topics previously considered taboo? Now it costs nothing to make distance themselves from the most horrific episodes of our Civil War and sketched ideas on "objective", as it did recently, the journalist-historian Ernesto Galli Della Loggia, who admits that "the" source of first-strength-Fascist vulgate was the need PCI to find a locus of the nascent democracy that its totalitarian nature denied him. "But it was the myth of the resistance broken, not carried out until" extreme consequence of a new class regime, which has reinforced the years "70 and "80 dreams of revenge of the" communist fighters "(from the Front Line in BR) in the long season of baptismal power terrorismo.Il Italian Communists (as defined by "a former journalist of" Unity Ferdinando Adornato, hours spent in the ranks of Berlusconi), has not only continued to credit part of a historical memory, but has long prevented it did the accounts, all accounts with the history of half a century, the resistance terrorismo.Forse find in a few years as a journalist willing G. Pansa that will discover the most hidden of our years of piombo.Per hours be satisfied with a feel-good Walter Veltroni that invites young people to reconsider and reclaim the whole of our history or renunciations of Gianfranco Fini, who takes a decidedly distanced itself from Fascism storico.Siamo in 2006 and the seasons of "hate lontanissime.Ma seem at the time if all they had done their part with dignity-not only the party leaders, but also historians and journalists-is not reasonable to think that this kind of civil war through a third generation that has bloodied the "Italy of the years "80, with the results we all know that terrorists would have been less cruel and more short-term? Luca Telese in his book" The Golden blacks "has revived the" chilling atmosphere of those years in which many young people were sent into the fray against a imaginary enemy, as left to right. The blame has been attributed to the many "bad teachers" of allora.Ma perhaps more than of great teachers and great guides us would require less conformity and more critically, in a few more that you fulfill the responsibilities and expose himself in first person, as they do today and Pansa Galli Della Loggia, revealing the great deceptions that time, under the veil ideological, nobody wanted to appear.
Pansa part with the spear against the commonly accepted politically correct and remove the "rhetoric scaffolding built by the communists after the war to glorify the resistance, no ifs, ands or buts. Hiding, however - and here would be the big lie-that the armed struggle led by the Communists in the Resistance and in the following years were more likely than "to create the basis for the" introduction of a class that they favored and led not to give a contribution to the birth or revival of democracy in Italia.Il journalist had been accused of bringing grist to the mill of the revisionists who would overturn the traditional historical interpretations on Fascism and Resistance. But, on closer inspection, revisionism is not "anything goes when you tell the sinkholes or individual episodes experienced by the losing side. It simply means that fill a void left by the rhetoric or deliberately by "indifference of the media. And "a task that can be undertaken by unscrupulous journalists who are not historians, as Pansa. D" Moreover even a journalist raised and grew up always in shadow of power, as Bruno Vespa, in his "Winners and losers" of the "year last had devoted much of his reflections on the seasons of "hate that have marked the history of the Italian resistance from terrorism, with chapters specifically dedicated to the" massacre of the vanquished, "to" thirty thousand dead after the liberation, "the sinkholes and the ethnic cleansing Marshal Tito.Ma because c "has taken so long to go beyond the real or alleged lies, if only to open a debate on issues such delicate and important? Why in G. Pansa were not enough the first 40 years of writer-journalist AA B. Vespa long decades of pompous television journalism, to discover and make popular topics previously considered taboo? Now it costs nothing to make distance themselves from the most horrific episodes of our Civil War and sketched ideas on "objective", as it did recently, the journalist-historian Ernesto Galli Della Loggia, who admits that "the" source of first-strength-Fascist vulgate was the need PCI to find a locus of the nascent democracy that its totalitarian nature denied him. "But it was the myth of the resistance broken, not carried out until" extreme consequence of a new class regime, which has reinforced the years "70 and "80 dreams of revenge of the" communist fighters "(from the Front Line in BR) in the long season of baptismal power terrorismo.Il Italian Communists (as defined by "a former journalist of" Unity Ferdinando Adornato, hours spent in the ranks of Berlusconi), has not only continued to credit part of a historical memory, but has long prevented it did the accounts, all accounts with the history of half a century, the resistance terrorismo.Forse find in a few years as a journalist willing G. Pansa that will discover the most hidden of our years of piombo.Per hours be satisfied with a feel-good Walter Veltroni that invites young people to reconsider and reclaim the whole of our history or renunciations of Gianfranco Fini, who takes a decidedly distanced itself from Fascism storico.Siamo in 2006 and the seasons of "hate lontanissime.Ma seem at the time if all they had done their part with dignity-not only the party leaders, but also historians and journalists-is not reasonable to think that this kind of civil war through a third generation that has bloodied the "Italy of the years "80, with the results we all know that terrorists would have been less cruel and more short-term? Luca Telese in his book" The Golden blacks "has revived the" chilling atmosphere of those years in which many young people were sent into the fray against a imaginary enemy, as left to right. The blame has been attributed to the many "bad teachers" of allora.Ma perhaps more than of great teachers and great guides us would require less conformity and more critically, in a few more that you fulfill the responsibilities and expose himself in first person, as they do today and Pansa Galli Della Loggia, revealing the great deceptions that time, under the veil ideological, nobody wanted to appear.
article was written by Elio Di Caprio and John Take it
0 comments:
Post a Comment